Fractured Wittgenstein

Having fun with text processing can produce some intersting results.
For example, I took some lines from, "Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus", by Ludwig Wittgenstein. (I got a free copy.)

Then ran the lines through a processing application, and here're some results:

Written into picture reality is a model sum total of the world.A situation that occurred in picture presents a sort of states that are independent and non logical in the space of the existence of affairs.A situation in a picture would seem to ourselves presented as facts, while determining that which existing states and non existence in the totality of affairs do not exist and could already be the possibility of logical space.Any few words of a sentence with a sense of reality constitutes its truth, disagreement, agreement, or falsity.What constitutes truth is disagreement or agreement with falsity in order to tell whether a picture is true or its sense false. So, we must compare it with reality.

And another subtended by a quote from a TV series with source credit.

What I confirm is by the fact that every proposition possesses one of its truth-conditions. Logic is not necessary in order to make an
inference from existence and non-existence. That man possesses the ability to construct languages capable of translating each pthematic
proposition of mathematics must go without saying. The method of determining the sense of the form, Thou shalt... Is laid against reality
like a space of possible states of affairs. It is impossible to infer that it signifies an object, but rather of the propositions that stood
if the true proposition is language. A tautology leaves open for its construction what is exactly at the same time; that is to think of the
same thing, as the same thing; to wit nothing.
The determinate way in which I consider two expressions connected by the fact that we use it and that some thing is in fact completely
congruent, and is only in default of certainty--if our knowledge of the most general form of an operation is the description of the variable
and becomes a proposition. It is unthinkable that its arguments shall have imposed a unified form on the other side of the constituents-- by
the configuration of simple signs, and so on. Objects contain the possibility of each individual case disclosing something about the world
as a variable. A proposition must already contain the verb. Every proposition is not possible, therefore, to introduce a new sense of The
correct explanation of the inference.
Indeed, it exists in one-dimensional space in which the propositions alone, (still less signs for relations), are Truth-functions and are
not primitive signs leading to arguments of the apparent logical constants also occuring in the negative sense.
Can we set up a form of a specific notation so that The fact that the symbol in p and not f(a,b) yields Pa = b? They contradict one another,
and We call the existence or non-existence of another or not another.
"Rubbish I say. Pure and utter rubbish." -The Fall and Rise of Reginald Perrin, ©BBC Worldwide Ltd 2002